PTCase ReportInternational journal of sports physical therapy2026

Rehabilitation Following a Distal Semitendinosus Excision in a Collegiate American Football Player: A Resident's Case Report.

Miles Moore, Matt Redd, Rodney Hill and 2 others

PMID 41939962

WHAT IT FOUND

One college football player returned to competition 12 weeks after surgery to excise an avulsed distal semitendinosus tendon, following a staged rehab from knee immobilizer to sprinting.

Eccentric hamstring strength was still 34.8% below his pre-injury max at clearance.

Key findings

01The athlete passed all of the team's return-to-sport criteria and was back playing football 12 weeks after surgery.

02Self-reported function improved by return to sport: the FASH went from 43% at baseline to 90% at 12 weeks, and the SANE from 10% to 85%.

03When he was cleared at 12 weeks, eccentric hamstring strength on the operated side was 66.1% of the other side, a 34.8% deficit against his own pre-injury maximum.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

One participant. The authors state that a case report cannot establish cause and effect, so nothing here shows the surgery or this rehabilitation programme works. Several treatments were given at once (the tendon excision, a platelet-rich plasma injection, blood flow restriction training, and a GPS-guided running progression), so the contribution of any one of them cannot be separated. Follow-up after return to sport lasted only a few months because of the college season, so long-term outcomes are unknown, including whether the knee flexion weakness persists. No minimal clinically important difference has been established for the FASH, so the size of the change in that score cannot be judged against a known threshold of meaningfulness. The college season limited how much reconditioning and testing could be done, and the authors say compensation strategies may have influenced the return-to-sport testing, which limits how well that battery shows true readiness. The findings are not applicable to other patients having this operation; this was one elite 20-year-old athlete and the authors state the design does not establish cause and effect.

Declared interests

The authors state they have no conflict of interest to disclose. No funding source is stated in the article. Several commercial devices and systems are named as part of the protocol (VALD dynamometry and NordBord, Delfi blood flow restriction, Catapult GPS), but the paper does not say who paid for the work or whether any of these companies were involved.

The easy way to misread this

Do not take this as evidence that excising a torn distal semitendinosus tendon, or this 12-week programme, gets athletes back to play. It is a single athlete with no comparison group, the authors say the design cannot establish cause and effect, and he also received a platelet-rich plasma injection and worked with a full sports medicine and coaching team. Note too that he was cleared while eccentric hamstring strength was still 34.8% below his own pre-injury maximum, and was kept off special teams afterwards, so passing the return-to-sport battery did not mean full recovery.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →