PTCase ReportInternational journal of sports physical therapy2022

Rehabilitation After Surgical Treatment of Pectoralis Major Rupture in a CrossFit® Practitioner: A Case Report.

Lucas Gomes da Silva, Rafael Marques Ferrer, José Roberto de Souza and 2 others

PMID 35693859

WHAT IT FOUND

One CrossFit athlete returned to all sport activities without deficits 16 weeks after pectoralis major repair.

The protocol used early passive motion and weekly progressive loading. This describes what happened to one person, not a proven treatment.

Key findings

01The patient returned to all CrossFit activities, including the injury mechanism, without range of motion or strength deficits after 16 weeks.

02Shoulder range of motion normalized by week seven, with full extension and rotation by week six.

03Muscle strength asymmetry observed at week seven resolved by week fourteen, showing relative symmetry in key movements.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This is a single case report, so the outcomes cannot be generalized to other patients. The rehabilitation progression was based on the therapist's clinical impression and experience with CrossFit, not a standardized protocol, making it difficult to replicate exactly. The patient had no history of anabolic steroid use and had been training for five years, which may influence healing and adherence compared to other populations. Long-term outcomes beyond 16 weeks were not reported.

Declared interests

No specific funding sources or conflicts of interest were declared in the provided text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret this as evidence that a 16-week protocol guarantees return to sport for all pectoralis major repairs. This is a single case of a motivated, experienced athlete, and the progression relied heavily on therapist judgment and patient adherence, which may not be present in other patients.

Read it on PubMed →