Reference values for muscle stiffness and asymmetry using myotonometry: a pilot study.
Seth Spicer, Adam Friedman, Dan Yacubovich and 1 others
PMID 41247237WHAT IT FOUND
Handheld myotonometry gave preliminary stiffness and asymmetry ranges for seven muscles in 26 healthy young adults.
Men were stiffer overall, but sex-specific ranges are needed; age, BMI, and weekly exercise did not show clear differences.
Key findings
01Reference intervals for muscle stiffness and asymmetry were established separately by sex across seven muscles.
02Males had higher global muscle stiffness than females (236.2 vs 196.2 N/m, p=0.017).
03Age, BMI, and weekly exercise were not significant predictors of stiffness (age p=0.388, BMI p=0.077, exercise p=0.790).
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The sample was only 26 healthy adults aged 18 to 29 from an osteopathic medical school, so the ranges may not apply to older adults, people with pain or injury, or different body types. The sex imbalance, 19 males and 7 females, makes female reference ranges less certain. The global stiffness average was a tentative composite of seven specific sites and would not be replicable if different muscles were measured. BMI was not significant in the regression (p=0.077), and the device cannot measure muscles with more than 20 mm of overlying fat. The study did not establish minimal clinically important differences or link stiffness to patient outcomes. Muscle-specific sex differences were inconsistent with the global result, because females had greater stiffness in some muscles and males in others. Asymmetry values were reported, but the study did not test whether asymmetry relates to handedness, pain, or function.
The easy way to misread this
Do not use these values as diagnostic cutoffs for pain or injury. They are preliminary reference ranges from 26 healthy young adults, and the study did not test patients or treatment effects.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →