Rasch analysis of the patient-rated wrist evaluation questionnaire.
Saravanan Esakki, Joy C MacDermid, Joshua I Vincent and 3 others
PMID 29497563WHAT IT FOUND
PRWE scores after wrist fracture mostly worked as separate pain and activity subscales, but several items needed rescoring or splitting by age and work status before the questionnaire behaved consistently.
Key findings
01After changes to some items, the PRWE's pain, specific activities, and usual activities subscales each behaved as separate measures.
02The pain subscale required rescoring the pain-frequency item and deleting the worst-pain item because of age-related bias.
03The usual activities subscale required collapsing two items and splitting two items by work status or age before fit improved.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The data came from one hand clinic and only from 6 months after fracture, so the findings may not apply earlier in recovery, later in recovery, or in other settings. The sample was a convenience set of existing cross-sectional data, not a newly recruited study designed for this analysis. Patients were 6 months post-injury, so many may already have been recovered, which can make it harder to see problems at the severe end of the scale. Age and work status were linked in this sample, so it is unclear which factor explained some item differences. The changes needed to make the questionnaire fit the model, such as deleting, rescoring, splitting, and bundling items, are not operational for ordinary clinical use.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that the unmodified PRWE total score is a single precise measure ready for routine clinical use. The questionnaire fit the model only after items were deleted, rescored, split by age or work status, or bundled, and the authors state these changes are not practical for general clinical practice.