RNOtherRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2022

Radiodermatitis: severity, predictive factors and discontinuation of radiotherapy in patients with anal and rectal cancer.

Larissa Jucá Dantas Bastos, Regina Serrão Lanzillotti, Marcos Antônio Gomes Brandão and 2 others

PMID 35723900

WHAT IT FOUND

99.1% of patients with anal or rectal cancer developed radiodermatitis during radiotherapy, and 34.8% had severe grades.

Nurses should watch women, age 65 and older, anal canal tumors, cobalt devices and IMRT for skin injury and interruption.

Key findings

01Radiodermatitis was almost universal, and severe Grade 3 or 4 reactions occurred in 34.8% of patients.

02Female sex, age 65 and older, anal canal tumor site, cobalt device and IMRT/VMAT technique were each associated with more severe radiodermatitis.

03Treatment interruption due to radiodermatitis occurred in 15 patients (13.4%), with interrupted days ranging from 3 to 46 and a mean of 16.74 days.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

It used one year of records from one cancer centre, so results may not apply to other services. Medical records were incomplete, and some variables had fewer patients than 112, such as comorbidity (108), smoking and alcohol (106), and combined chemotherapy (109). No sample size calculation was done. It was retrospective and cross-sectional, so it can show associations but cannot prove that any factor caused severe radiodermatitis. Diarrhea grading may have been underreported.

Declared interests

The supplied text does not report funding or conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that the nursing consultation prevented severe radiodermatitis or treatment interruption. The study had no comparison group and did not test the consultation, so it cannot show that the care worked.

Read it on PubMed →