Questioning assent: how are children's views included as families make decisions about clinical trials?
L Madden, V Shilling, K Woolfall and 4 others
PMID 27136194WHAT IT FOUND
Children invited into trials leaned on parents to explain and decide.
Parents could shape whether a child agreed. A girl entered because her parents persuaded her, then left once she knew she could.
Key findings
01Children often left the work of understanding the trial to parents and described their knowledge as coming from parental explanations.
02Parents did not only help with answers; they could reframe questions and add persuasion, shaping the child's assent.
03In one family, the girl entered the trial after parental persuasion and later withdrew after learning she could leave.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they found
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study covered three trials for chronic conditions where decision-making happened over a long period, so it may not apply to time-limited trial recruitment. The parents in the study were highly involved in explaining the trial, so other families may not behave the same way. Parents were present for most child interviews, which may have amplified the visible role of parents. The paper says specialist ethical questions about assent are beyond its scope.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read a child's agreement as proof that the child independently understood the trial. Parents often explained the information, reframed questions and persuaded the child, and the study describes family talk rather than tested outcomes.