Quality of life measurement tools for people with dementia and intellectual disabilities: A systematic review.
Winnie Tsang, David Oliver, Paraskevi Triantafyllopoulou
PMID 36380473WHAT IT FOUND
No quality-of-life measure has been properly tested for adults with both intellectual disabilities and dementia.
The one tool with any testing was only done in Italian, for late-stage dementia. The other has no testing at all.
Key findings
01Only two studies met the inclusion criteria, and no instrument was designed specifically for adults with both intellectual disabilities and dementia.
02The QUALID scale showed good internal consistency and reliability with only weak convergent validity, but was validated solely in Italian and designed for late-stage dementia, so it may not suit earlier stages or English-speaking populations.
03The DEMQOL-proxy was used with 9 residents but no reliability or validity data were reported for this population, leaving it unvalidated for adults with intellectual disabilities and dementia.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only two studies were found across 10 databases, so the evidence base is extremely thin. The QUALID was validated only in Italian, so its performance in English-speaking intellectual disability services is unknown. The QUALID was designed for late-stage dementia where the person can no longer communicate, so it may not capture the experience of someone with mild intellectual disability and early dementia who can still talk about their own life. The DEMQOL-proxy study had only 9 participants and reported no reliability or validity data for this population. No self-report measures have been validated for adults with intellectual disabilities and dementia, so the person's own voice is missing from all available tools. The search was limited to English-language articles, potentially excluding relevant work in other languages. Both included studies used proxy or observational ratings rather than the person's own account, and proxy ratings are known to be influenced by the carer's own perceptions and mood.
Declared interests
No conflicts of interest declared by the authors.
The easy way to misread this
Do not assume the QUALID is ready to use for your patients with intellectual disabilities and dementia. It was validated only in Italian and only for late-stage dementia where the person can no longer communicate. A person with mild intellectual disability and early dementia may still be able to talk about their own quality of life, and this tool would not capture that. The other tool, the DEMQOL-proxy, has no validation data for this group at all.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →