Pulp-to-palm distance after plate fixation of a distal radius fracture corresponds to functional outcome.
Hugo Jakobsson, Eva Lundqvist, Per Wretenberg and 1 others
PMID 36941730WHAT IT FOUND
Patients who could not get their fingertips to their palm four weeks after plate surgery for a wrist fracture had worse wrist movement, grip strength and self-rated hand function at 3 and 6 months.
Most differences had disappeared by 12 months.
Key findings
01Three months after surgery, the group with a pulp-to-palm gap did worse on almost every measure: worse QuickDASH and patient-rated wrist scores, less wrist extension, flexion, supination, radial and ulnar deviation, and weaker grip. Pain at rest and on activity was similar in both groups.
02Twelve months after surgery the gap group still had significantly worse QuickDASH scores and less wrist extension and flexion than the group with no gap.
03The pattern was not the same for both operations. After volar plating the differences were present at 3 months but had disappeared by 6 and 12 months; after combined plating, wrist extension and flexion were still worse at 12 months.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The two groups were not created at random. Patients were sorted by the pulp-to-palm measurement taken four weeks after surgery, so the groups may differ in other ways that could explain the worse outcomes. Only 11 of the patients who had volar plating had a gap above zero, against 25 after combined plating. With numbers this small the analysis has less power, and the authors say a larger group would probably have shown differences on more of the measures. There was no pulp-to-palm measurement before surgery, so the researchers could not tell whether a patient already had a gap going into the operation. Ten patients were missing the four-week pulp-to-palm measurement and were excluded, and five more withdrew by 12 months. For smaller differences the study was underpowered. The authors' own calculation gives a power of 0.68 for a medium-sized difference and 0.16 for a small one. The QuickDASH difference at 3 months was statistically significant but did not reach the threshold the authors accept as a clinically important change.
Declared interests
The paper's funding statement names Orebro University. It reports no other funding source and no author disclosures in the text provided. The dorsal plates used for the combined operation were developed by the authors' own unit together with the manufacturer, Trimed Inc., which also made the implants used in the study.
The easy way to misread this
Do not take this as proof that stiff fingers cause the worse outcomes. Patients were sorted into the two groups after surgery, not assigned at random, so the groups may have differed in other ways, and nothing here shows that treating the gap would improve anything. The QuickDASH difference at 3 months also fell short of the authors' own threshold for a clinically important change.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →