Psychosocial Aspects of ART Counseling: A Comparison of HIV Beliefs and Knowledge in PMTCT and ART-Naïve Women.
Hetta Gouse, Michelle Henry, Reuben N Robbins and 4 others
PMID 28377125WHAT IT FOUND
Basic HIV knowledge was generally good, but fewer than 64% answered items about ART resistance and viral load correctly.
Many women feared ART would disrupt life, and disclosure was difficult. These gaps are worth checking before assuming prior PMTCT solved them.
Key findings
01More than 80% answered all basic HIV knowledge items correctly, but fewer than 64% correctly answered treatment items about ART resistance and viral load.
02Disclosure remained difficult: 49.3% said disclosing would be difficult, 46.5% disagreed it could help medication management, and 40% were not interested in disclosing.
03ART-naïve women were more likely than PMTCT women to strongly agree that people should stop treatment periodically (45.3% vs 18.1%).
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This was a one-time questionnaire comparison, not a trial of counseling, so it cannot show that prior PMTCT counseling caused the observed differences. Some between-group differences were small and may not change how patients actually take their medicines. The women were selected from a larger trial that required a treatment support partner and an electronic medication monitor, so they may be more supported or monitored than typical patients. One basic HIV knowledge measure had weak reliability, so its total score may not be dependable. The paper described the direction of some belief-scale differences in a way that did not match its own scoring rules.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the belief-scale differences as clear evidence that prior PMTCT counseling reduced traditional beliefs or medication concerns. This was a one-time questionnaire comparison, not a test of counseling effects, and the paper's stated direction for some scales conflicted with its own scoring.