Psychometric Testing of an Instrument Assessing Family Knowledge, Contemplation, Confidence and Readiness for Engaging in Early Mobilisation of Critically Ill Patients: A Multi-Site Cross-Sectional Design.
Sasithorn Mukpradab, Michael Ireland, Georgia Tobiano and 5 others
PMID 39227184WHAT IT FOUND
Family members of critically ill patients could answer a 22-item questionnaire about what they know, have thought about, feel confident doing and are ready to do for early mobilisation.
It may help ICU teams screen family readiness.
Key findings
01The 22-item questionnaire fit four intended scales: knowledge, contemplation, confidence and readiness, with fit indices CFI 0.99, TLI 0.99, RMSEA 0.06 and SRMR 0.05.
02Subscale internal consistency was good to excellent, with omega coefficients of 0.85, 0.92, 0.91 and 0.88.
03One knowledge item had limited response variation and loaded below the pre-set threshold before a minor model modification.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The survey was done during COVID-19 visiting restrictions, so family members' willingness and views may not reflect usual ICU conditions. Only English-speaking family members of adult ICU patients expected to stay at least 72 hours and survive were included, so results may not apply to other languages, cultures or ICU settings. It tested the questionnaire only; it did not test whether using it changes family engagement, patient mobility or recovery. One knowledge item had limited response variation and a lower loading, and similar wording across items may inflate reliability estimates. Nearly half the respondents were not living with the patient, which may affect family dynamics and willingness to engage. The modified model needs independent validation and the instrument needs testing in other languages, cultures and ICU settings.
Declared interests
In-kind resources were provided by Gold Coast Health, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital and Logan Hospital. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as evidence that family members can safely mobilise patients or that using the questionnaire improves recovery. It tested whether family members' answers formed four consistent scales; it did not test an intervention or patient outcomes.