Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the recovery locus of control (RLOC) Scale among patients with myocardial infarction.
Yuli Li, Dong Kong, Wei Wang and 2 others
PMID 33072366WHAT IT FOUND
A Chinese nine-item recovery control scale for heart attack patients scored consistently and separated two ways of seeing recovery, so nurses could ask patients before discharge whether they see recovery as their own or others' control.
Key findings
01The Chinese version of the recovery control scale had acceptable consistency: 0.80 for the total scale and 0.92 and 0.76 for its two parts.
02All nine items were discriminative, and the two subscale groups explained 70.50% of the total response variance.
03The total recovery control score did not differ significantly by age, sex, marital status, residence, education, occupation, or primary caregiver.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The sample came from one tertiary hospital and was a convenience sample, so it may not apply to county hospitals or other MI populations. Data were collected only once, before discharge, so the researchers could not check whether the scale gives the same result over time. Face validity and convergent validity were not tested, so the scale has not been checked against other similar measures. The authors noted no significant relationships between patient characteristics and total scores, which they say might be sampling error. It was tested only in patients ready for discharge who could read and speak Chinese, not in people with cognitive impairment or language barriers.
Declared interests
The supplied article text does not include a conflict of interest statement; the publication type notes non-U.S. government research support.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as proof that using the scale improves recovery or reduces readmission. The study tested only whether the Chinese version measured recovery beliefs consistently; it did not test any care plan or patient outcome.