RNSurveyNursing open2023

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the supportive care needs survey for caregivers of children with Paediatric cancer (SCNS-C-Ped-C).

Jingting Wang, Xuanyi Bi, Shuyi Zhang and 5 others

PMID 36894867

WHAT IT FOUND

The Chinese Supportive Care Needs Survey for caregivers of children with paediatric cancer reliably measures six domains: healthcare information, daily care communication, psychological spiritual, medical service, economic, and emotional needs.

It takes 5 to 10 minutes to complete.

Key findings

01The revised scale identifies six distinct domains of supportive care needs, including specific medical service and economic needs, differing from the four domains in the original English version.

02The scale demonstrates high internal consistency with a total Cronbach's alpha of 0.968 and split-half reliability of 0.883.

03Caregivers found all items comprehensible during pilot testing, and the survey takes approximately 5 to 10 minutes to complete.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample was recruited from only three tertiary hospitals in China, limiting generalizability to other regions or community settings. Convenience sampling was used, which may introduce selection bias. Participants were predominantly educated caregivers, potentially excluding those with lower literacy. The study did not evaluate test-retest reliability, so the stability of scores over time is unknown. The sample was heavily skewed toward leukaemia (83.3%), so the scale's performance for other paediatric cancers is less certain.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume this scale is valid for caregivers of children with cancers other than leukaemia or for populations outside China without further validation, as the sample was highly specific to tertiary hospitals and leukaemia cases.

Read it on PubMed →