PTRCTPhysical therapy2024

Prognostic Factors and Treatment Effect Modifiers for Physical Health, Opioid Prescription, and Health Care Utilization in Patients With Musculoskeletal Disorders in Primary Care: Exploratory Secondary Analysis of the STEMS Randomized Trial of Direct Access to Physical Therapist-Led Care.

James Zouch, Nazim Bhimani, André Bussières and 3 others

PMID 38696361

WHAT IT FOUND

The STEMS trial did not find a meaningful physical health advantage from adding an offer of direct access to physical therapy to GP care.

Belief in managing pain predicted better health, fewer opioid prescriptions, and less care use. Severe pain predicted the opposite.

Key findings

01Higher pain self-efficacy was associated with better physical health, lower odds of opioid prescription, and lower health care utilization.

02Severe bodily pain was associated with worse physical health, higher odds of opioid prescription, and higher health care utilization, while low back pain was associated with worse physical health and higher odds of opioid prescription.

03No evidence was found that age, pain duration, education, or low back pain changed the effect of the direct-access offer on opioid prescription or health care utilization.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This was an exploratory secondary analysis of a pilot cluster randomized trial, not a study powered to find which patients benefit most from the direct-access offer. The trial included only 4 general practices in the United Kingdom, and patients were recruited from June 2013 to January 2014, so current practice patterns may differ. The intervention was an offer of direct access, not all participants receiving physical therapy; only 36% in the offer arm accessed physical therapy, and only 33% did so directly. Of 978 participants in the trial, 767 completed 6-month questionnaires and only 457 had complete observations for all variables, so missing data may affect the estimates. Health care utilization was self-reported and combined different investigations and procedures, so it cannot distinguish appropriate from inappropriate care or separate the effects of imaging, injections, and surgery. Prior opioid use was not available, and opioid prescription was measured over 6 months at 4 sites, which may not reflect longer-term prescribing elsewhere. The prognostic models used backward stepwise selection and were not validated, so the reported associations may be unstable. The analysis found associations, not causes; pain self-efficacy and pain severity may be markers of risk rather than targets that, if changed, improve outcomes.

Declared interests

The paper reports funding from the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Charitable Trust, GP and Physiotherapy Research Facilitators, and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that older patients or those with longer pain benefit more from being offered direct access to physical therapy. Those subgroup patterns were not significant and had large uncertainty; the analysis found no treatment effect modifier.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
767 of 978 participants included in the STEMS trial completed 6-month questionnaires; 457 had complete observations for all variables.
Certainty of evidence
Moderate

More in orthopaedic

Browse

Cite

James Zouch, Nazim Bhimani, André Bussières, et al. Prognostic Factors and Treatment Effect Modifiers for Physical Health, Opioid Prescription, and Health Care Utilization in Patients With Musculoskeletal Disorders in Primary Care: Exploratory Secondary Analysis of the STEMS Randomized Trial of Direct Access to Physical Therapist-Led Care. Physical therapy. 2024.

Read the original