RNSystematic ReviewRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2017

Procedures for measuring and verifying gastric tube placement in newborns: an integrative review.

Flávia de Souza Barbosa Dias, Suellen Cristina Dias Emidio, Maria Helena Baena de Moraes Lopes and 3 others

PMID 28699995

WHAT IT FOUND

Evidence supports measuring newborn gastric tubes by nose-ear-mid-umbilicus length rather than nose-ear-xiphoid, and confirming placement by aspirating secretion and checking pH and color; epigastric air-bubble auscultation is unreliable.

Key findings

01When only tubes in the stomach were counted correct, NEMU was 90.9% accurate and NEX 60.6%; NEX errors put the tube above the gastroesophageal junction.

02For confirming correct placement, pH below 6.0 plus translucent greenish or brownish secretion was identified as the safest bedside technique.

03Absence of aspirated secretion had the highest positive predictive value (66.7%) for incorrect tube placement.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The review included 17 studies, but only one well-delineated randomized controlled trial, two randomized controlled trials and 14 descriptive studies; no systematic reviews or meta-analyses were found. Accuracy studies did not all measure the same thing: some tested correct placement, others tested incorrect placement, so their values cannot be simply compared. The height-based equation study had only 1% newborns, and the electromagnetic tracing and diaphragm electrical activity studies had very small pediatric samples. Several methods were expensive, and ultrasound was not reviewed here; a pilot report found it unreliable in 10 newborns. Radiology, the reference standard, was not practical for every tube check because of cost, radiation and immediate displacement. All included articles were in English.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest. No funding source is reported.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this review as proof that bedside checks are as safe as radiology or that NEMU, pH and color checks have been proven in large neonatal trials. The evidence base was mostly descriptive and small, and some studies measured different endpoints, so the recommendations are practical syntheses rather than definitive efficacy findings.

Read it on PubMed →