PTOtherJournal of physical therapy science2019

Pressure biofeedback unit to assess and train lumbopelvic stability in supine individuals with chronic low back pain.

Carlos Filipe Barbosa Crasto, António Mesquita Montes, Paulo Carvalho and 1 others

PMID 31645801

WHAT IT FOUND

Using a pressure biofeedback unit during a leg raise did not correlate with muscle activity or balance, so it cannot assess stability.

However, seeing the unit's reading helped participants increase abdominal muscle activity and reduce pelvic sway.

Key findings

01Pressure readings from the biofeedback unit did not correlate with abdominal muscle activity or mediolateral centre of pressure displacement.

02When participants used the biofeedback unit to keep pressure steady during a leg raise, abdominal muscle activity increased significantly for most muscles, and mediolateral centre of pressure displacement decreased.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study only included young adults (18-30 years) who were not overweight and had a specific positive test result, so the findings may not apply to older or heavier patients with low back pain. The sample size was small (18 participants) and heavily skewed toward women (14 females, 4 males). The order of the tests was not randomized, which could introduce bias.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest or funding.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume the pressure biofeedback unit accurately measures muscle activity or stability. The study found no correlation between the unit's readings and the actual muscle or balance measures, meaning the numbers on the screen are not a valid assessment tool.

Read it on PubMed →