RNPilotJournal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association2022

Prenatal Provider Breastfeeding Toolkit: Results of a Pilot to Increase Women's Prenatal Breastfeeding Support, Intentions, and Outcomes.

Casey Rosen-Carole, Jill Halterman, Constance D Baldwin and 6 others

PMID 33823702

WHAT IT FOUND

Breastfeeding initiation and early breastfeeding duration were similar before and after a prenatal toolkit.

Women had more peer-counselor referrals, more supportive counseling, and higher breastfeeding intention.

Key findings

01Post-intervention women were more likely to have a WIC peer counselor referral initiated (60.0% vs. 36.6%).

02Post-intervention women were more likely to report any breastfeeding intention (71.8% vs. 88.6%) and intending to breastfeed for at least 1 year (14.1% vs. 31.4%).

03Breastfeeding initiation (70.4% vs. 80.0%) and exclusivity at 1 month (23.7% vs. 37.7%) did not differ significantly.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This was a small pilot, so it could miss smaller differences in breastfeeding outcomes. Women were not randomly assigned; the comparison was before versus after the toolkit was introduced. The intervention combined provider counseling materials and peer-counselor referral, so it cannot show which part mattered. Interviewers knew which prenatal practice women came from, and answers were collected face-to-face, which may have made women report what they thought was expected. Breastfeeding duration relied on self-report, and breastfeeding beyond the early postpartum follow-up was not measured. Actual toolkit use was hard to count because counseling was sometimes documented elsewhere and some referrals were not submitted. Non-English speakers were not included because translators could not be funded.

Declared interests

The toolkit was developed through an NIH-funded project. One author is on the medical board of May & Meadow, a biotech start-up; the other named authors declared no competing financial interests.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the higher intention and referral rates as proof that the toolkit changed breastfeeding outcomes. Initiation and duration did not differ, and this was a small pilot.

Read it on PubMed →