RNSurveyInternational journal of nursing sciences2023

Predictive factors based on the health belief model on cancer screening behaviour in first degree relatives of patients with Lynch syndrome-associated colorectal cancer.

Jiaojiao Gu, Shumin Jia, Huaxiang Chao and 2 others

PMID 37128484

WHAT IT FOUND

Only 23% of high-risk relatives of patients with Lynch syndrome-associated colorectal cancer had undergone screening.

Older age, being male, married, having higher disease knowledge, and believing in screening benefits and self-efficacy predicted this behaviour.

Key findings

01Less than a quarter of the first-degree relatives had undergone screening for Lynch syndrome-associated cancers.

02Diagnosis of the index patient, knowledge level, health beliefs, age, sex, and marital status were identified as predictive factors of screening behaviour.

03Perceived benefits and self-efficacy were the only two domains of health belief that predicted screening behaviour in the regression model.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was exploratory and cross-sectional, so it cannot determine causality between factors and screening behaviour. Participants were recruited from a single hospital in China, which limits the generalizability of the results to other populations or healthcare systems. The analysis did not account for the clustering of data from relatives within the same family. The study did not include a screening support system as a predictive factor, which may have influenced the results.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflict of interest. The study was funded by the Medical Research Fund of Guangdong Province, which did not participate in the design, implementation, or analysis.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the identified predictive factors as proven causes of screening behaviour. The cross-sectional design only shows associations at a single point in time, and the study did not test whether changing knowledge or health beliefs actually increases screening rates.

Read it on PubMed →