Powered ankle-foot orthoses: the effects of the assistance on healthy and impaired users while walking.
Marta Moltedo, Tomislav Baček, Tom Verstraten and 3 others
PMID 30285869WHAT IT FOUND
Powered ankle-foot orthoses can reduce walking effort in healthy lab users, but effects vary by device and person.
Evidence is sparse for impaired walkers, so do not expect a standard clinical benefit.
Key findings
01In healthy users, several augmentation studies reported metabolic cost reductions of 10% to 21% compared with unpowered walking.
02For stroke users, powered walking sometimes reduced metabolic cost, but a stroke study found no significant difference between powered and unpowered walking.
03Elderly and impaired users cannot be assumed to respond like healthy users, and studies often did not measure whether users had reached a steady state.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This is a narrative review of heterogeneous laboratory studies, not a single clinical trial, and it does not pool results or give a combined estimate. Many studies used small convenience samples, often healthy young adults, so findings may not apply to community-dwelling or more impaired patients. Devices differed in actuator, controller, weight, unilateral or bilateral use, assistance direction, and protocol, making direct comparison difficult. Some soft exosuits provided hip assistance along with ankle assistance, so effects cannot be assigned to the ankle component alone. Adaptation and steady-state effects were often not assessed, especially in elderly and impaired users, so short-term powered walking changes may not reflect long-term clinical effects. The paper does not report clinical outcomes such as falls, participation, function, or patient-reported benefit.
Declared interests
The supplied metadata lists non-U.S. government research support, but the article text does not provide an author conflict statement.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the reported metabolic cost reductions or gait improvements as evidence that powered ankle-foot orthoses are proven for clinical use. The review mostly summarizes small laboratory studies, many on healthy walkers, and the authors say elderly and impaired users cannot be inferred from healthy results.