Postural stability during low-intensity respiratory loading in pre-COPD and healthy adults: a cross-sectional study.
Leonel A T Alves, Edgar Ribeiro, Carlos Crasto and 5 others
In 31 adults, those with pre-COPD had faster postural sway in all breathing conditions and a larger sway increase when breathing against low inspiratory resistance, compared to healthy controls.
The authors call this exploratory and not yet clinically meaningful.
Key findings
1Mean centre-of-pressure velocity was significantly higher in the pre-COPD group than in the healthy group across all three breathing conditions, in both the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions and for total velocity.
2A significant load-by-group interaction was found for all velocity outcomes, with the pre-COPD group showing an accentuated response pattern specifically during inspiratory loading compared to the healthy group.
3No significant main group effect was found for mean centre-of-pressure amplitude, but a significant load-by-group interaction indicated that the pre-COPD group had a larger amplitude increase during inspiratory loading than the healthy group.
to read the rest of this summary — three full summaries a month, no card.
Already have an account?
What it does not show
Small sample (17 pre-COPD, 14 healthy) with no a priori sample-size calculation; the authors note this limits the precision of effect-size estimates, particularly for interaction effects. Convenience sampling from a university community, which may limit generalisability to broader at-risk populations. Cross-sectional design: the study shows a between-group difference at one time point, not a change over time or a causal effect. Pre-COPD was defined by symptoms and exposure history only, without structural imaging or advanced physiological testing; the authors acknowledge this is a pragmatically defined subgroup within the broader pre-COPD construct. Spirometry was performed without bronchodilator, so a small number of participants may have been misclassified as having preserved spirometry. Smoking exposure is a potential confounder: the independent contributions of smoking and pre-COPD status to the observed differences cannot be separated in this design. Ventilatory parameters were not objectively monitored during the balance testing; adherence to the audio-paced rhythm relied on the auditory cue alone. Foot placement was visually standardised rather than instrumentally measured, and sex-specific stance instructions may have introduced residual variability, particularly for mediolateral outcomes. No minimal clinically important difference has been established for force-plate centre-of-pressure metrics in COPD or pre-COPD, and the base-of-support-normalised units used here preclude direct comparison with existing thresholds.
Declared interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest and state they received no financial support or grants for this study.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →