PTOTSLPCohortFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025

Plea for routine endoscopic tracheostomy tube adjustment.

Bettina Otto, Regina Lindemann, Holger Kirsch and 3 others

PMID 40777596

WHAT IT FOUND

Routine endoscopy found two-thirds of tracheostomy tubes in neurorehab patients were malpositioned, causing visible tracheal injury in 19%.

No patient factors predicted misplacement. Check tube position endoscopically upon admission or at first change.

Key findings

01Malpositioned tracheostomy tubes were found in 65% of endoscopic examinations, with visible tracheal lesions in 19% of cases.

02Patient age, gender, diagnosis, and time since tracheostomy were not associated with tube malposition.

03The authors recommend routine endoscopic checks upon admission or at the first tube change, noting that retrospective data cannot prove this improves decannulation outcomes.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was retrospective and conducted at a single center, which limits generalizability. It did not include a control group of patients who did not receive routine endoscopic checks, so it cannot prove that this practice improves outcomes like decannulation rates. Data on bronchoscopy results from referring clinics were not routinely reported and thus could not be analyzed. The analysis treated multiple examinations from the same patient as independent data points, though the authors justified this by anatomical changes between exams.

Declared interests

The authors declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume that routine endoscopic checks have been proven to speed up decannulation or prevent long-term complications. The authors state that their retrospective data cannot conclusively prove these outcome benefits, and future prospective studies are needed.

Read it on PubMed →