Physical Therapists Use of Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging in Clinical Practice: A Review of Case Reports.
Robert Manske, Katherine Podoll, Alycia Markowski and 3 others
PMID 36793560WHAT IT FOUND
In 42 published physical therapy cases, ultrasound use was followed by confirmed diagnosis in 33, changed treatment in 29, and referral in 25.
These are case reports, not proof ultrasound works.
Key findings
01Forty-five complete case reports were obtained, and 42 cases were assessed.
02Physical therapists performed ultrasound in 22 cases, another health care professional performed it in 15 cases, and six cases did not identify the sonographer.
03Thirty-three cases resulted in a confirmed diagnosis from ultrasound, and 29 cases documented a change in physical therapy intervention.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
These are published case reports, not controlled studies, so they cannot show that ultrasound causes better diagnosis or outcomes. The authors state publication bias is likely, because case reports must be novel and the true frequency of ultrasound use in physical therapy is unknown. The search was limited to English-language papers and may have missed relevant reports. Most cases came from outpatient orthopaedic or sports settings, with only one inpatient case, so it says little about other physical therapy practice areas. Some anatomical regions and whether imaging was static or dynamic were inferred from images rather than stated clearly. Outcomes were mostly diagnosis, referral, or treatment change; patient-specific clinical outcomes were often not reported.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the 33 confirmed diagnoses and 29 treatment changes as proof that ultrasound improves physical therapy care. These are published case reports selected for interesting presentations, and the paper reports no comparison group or patient outcome measures.