PTPilotJournal of physical therapy science2022

Physical therapist-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy and exercise for older outpatients with knee osteoarthritis: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Yasuhiro Nagasawa, Ai Shibata, Hanako Fukamachi and 2 others

PMID 36507082

WHAT IT FOUND

Adding physical therapist-delivered ACT to exercise did not show a clear reduction in physical disability.

The group receiving ACT plus exercise improved and was lower than usual care at 4 weeks, but pilot small and dropouts high.

Key findings

01The main physical disability comparison was not statistically significant (p=0.09).

02The group receiving ACT plus exercise showed within-group physical disability reductions from pre-intervention to 4 weeks after intervention (p=0.01, 95% CI 2.49-7.90), but the contribution of ACT versus exercise cannot be separated.

03Eight patients in the ACT plus exercise group and seven in usual care completed the study.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 30 participants were analysed in a single centre, and 27 were women, so results may not apply to other older knee osteoarthritis populations. Half of participants dropped out: eight of 15 in the ACT plus exercise group and seven of 15 in usual care completed the study. The trial was open-label, and the paper states grouping randomization was not blinded or stratified, so measurement and intervention effects may be biased. The exercise dose was once weekly for 30 minutes, while the authors note previous studies used at least 2-3 times a week for 20-30 minutes to affect physical function. The physical therapist delivering ACT had only a 6-hour 3-day training, no ongoing clinical psychologist support during the intervention, and no private room was provided. Missing data were handled by last measured value under intention-to-treat, but the authors say the results were not fully reflected.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as proof that ACT adds benefit to exercise. The main comparison of groups over time was not significant (p=0.09), half of participants dropped out, and the between-group difference at 4 weeks came from comparisons after the main test in a small pilot.

Read it on PubMed →