PTSystematic ReviewInternational journal of sports physical therapy2022

Physical impairments in Adults with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) undergoing Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Michael J M O'Brien, Julie S Jacobsen, Adam I Semciw and 5 others

PMID 36237653

WHAT IT FOUND

Walking differences between people with hip dysplasia and healthy people were gone a year after periacetabular osteotomy.

Before surgery they walked with less hip extension; hip strength did not change after surgery, and 58% still had a positive impingement test one to three years later.

Key findings

01Before surgery, people with developmental dysplasia of the hip walked with a smaller peak hip extension angle and a lower peak hip extension moment than asymptomatic people. The angle difference was still present six months after surgery but not at twelve months.

02A positive anterior hip impingement test was found in 58% of patients before periacetabular osteotomy and at one to three years afterwards; in studies of people five or more years after surgery the proportion had fallen to 17%.

03Hip abduction strength and hip flexion strength did not change from before to after periacetabular osteotomy in the pooled results.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

All 24 studies were observational, none was randomised, and many were retrospective, so the review's own authors say the results cannot reach a high level of evidence and rate the certainty as low. Most studies did not describe the patients they lost to follow-up, and only four of the 24 said the outcome measures they used were valid and reliable. Post-operative assessment timepoints and outcome measures varied widely, which stopped the reviewers pooling most of the data; several findings rest on a single study, including running and functional tasks. Only four studies measured strength, and some had fewer than 30 patients, so a real change in strength could have been missed. Some participants are counted more than once because their data were published in more than one paper. The review looked only at people awaiting or recovering from this surgery, so it says nothing about people with dysplasia who are managed without it.

Declared interests

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The review was registered in advance on PROSPERO (CRD42020180571). The paper does not state who funded the work.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this review as evidence that periacetabular osteotomy restores hip muscle strength or clears a positive impingement test. Pooled results showed hip abduction and flexion strength unchanged one and two years after surgery, and 58% of patients still tested positive one to three years afterwards. The impingement figure only fell to 17% in studies of people five or more years out.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →