PTOTSurveyProsthetics and orthotics international2020

Physical activity guidelines and promotion: An online survey of United Kingdom's prosthetic rehabilitation healthcare professionals.

Sarah Deans, Alison Kirk, Anthony McGarry and 1 others

PMID 32449462

WHAT IT FOUND

UK prosthetic rehabilitation professionals averaged 6.42 of 11 on physical activity guideline knowledge.

Physiotherapists scored 7.00, prosthetists/orthotists 6.24, and other professionals 5.89. This was self-report only, so it does not show what patients received.

Key findings

0160.4% of all respondents were aware of the physical activity guidelines.

02Respondents scored 6.42 out of 11 on guideline knowledge, with physiotherapists scoring 7.00, prosthetists/orthotists scoring 6.24, and other professionals scoring 5.89.

03As age, years qualified, and years working in clinical practice increased, knowledge of physical activity guidelines decreased.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This was a survey of healthcare professionals' self-reported awareness, knowledge, and practice. It did not measure what patients were told, what patients did, or patient health outcomes. 106 respondents completed a survey aimed at an estimated 370 UK prosthetic rehabilitation workers, and the authors note responders may have been more interested and motivated than non-responders. The survey was UK-specific, so it may not apply to other countries or health systems. Questions were prescriptive and may have prompted later answers, so the responses may not have been independent. Not all professionals working with people with limb absence were captured, and the other professional group was small, including only 3 occupational therapists. The paper states there were no known published physical activity guidelines for patients with limb absence at the time of writing, so general adult guideline knowledge may not translate directly.

Declared interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest and received no funding for the research, authorship, or publication.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the higher physiotherapist scores or reported promotion as proof that patients receive better physical activity advice or have better outcomes. This was a self-report survey of professionals, not a patient trial.

Read it on PubMed →