QualitativeDisability and health journal2021

Perceptions of barriers to effective family planning services among women with disabilities.

Jeanne L Alhusen, Tina Bloom, Kathryn Laughon and 2 others

PMID 33384277

WHAT IT FOUND

Almost all women with disabilities interviewed said inaccessible clinics, costs, and providers who avoided contraception talk made family planning hard.

They also struggled to find methods that worked with their disability-related side effects and physical limits.

Key findings

01With one exception, all participants reported barriers to obtaining family planning services.

02Many participants said providers were reluctant to raise contraception, and some said family planning was never discussed; participants attributed this to being seen as asexual.

03Participants also struggled to find methods that worked: side effects were harder when the disability already caused similar symptoms, and mobility limitations made IUD insertion positioning difficult.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they found

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only women who could demonstrate understanding of informed consent were eligible, so women with significant cognitive disabilities were not included. Convenience sampling through social media and disability organizations may limit generalizability; participants connected to these supports may not represent all US women with disabilities. Four women were excluded from the 31 women included in the qualitative aim, and the number actually analysed is not clear. The study is qualitative and did not test family planning services or interventions, so it cannot show whether any barrier caused unintended pregnancy or whether a solution works. All participants identified as heterosexual, so the findings may not apply to women with other sexual orientations.

Declared interests

The authors reported no conflict of interest. The paper is listed as supported by NIH extramural research.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that any specific barrier caused unintended pregnancy or that a family planning intervention works. This was a qualitative study of women who already had unintended pregnancies, and it did not test treatments or compare outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
31 women living with a disability; four were excluded
Certainty of evidence
Very low

Browse

    Cite

    Jeanne L Alhusen, Tina Bloom, Kathryn Laughon, et al. Perceptions of barriers to effective family planning services among women with disabilities. Disability and health journal. 2021.

    Read the original