RNQualitativeInternational journal of community based nursing and midwifery2021

Perceived Supportive Paradox After Diagnosing Human Papillomavirus: A Qualitative Content Analysis.

Narjes Nick, Camellia Torabizadeh, Mehdi Ghahartars

PMID 33875962

WHAT IT FOUND

People diagnosed with HPV described receiving support and lack of support at the same time.

They said reassuring information from providers eased fear, while stigma, blame, or mixed messages from providers and family increased anxiety.

Key findings

01The main theme was a perceived supportive paradox, in which participants could experience support and lack of support at the same time.

02Some participants received necessary and true information from health service providers about sexual relationships, virus types, treatment, virus clearance, and Pap smear intervals.

03Participants feared they might soon develop cancer and were bewildered by contradictory explanations from the medical team.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was qualitative and done in one Iranian clinic, so it describes experiences rather than testing whether any counselling approach works. The study did not include homosexual participants despite attempts to seek maximum variation. The interviewer was female and some participants were male, which may have affected responses. Some participants were health service providers, so the themes combine patient, spouse, and provider perspectives.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these themes as evidence that a specific counselling programme works. The study described patients' and providers' experiences and did not test outcomes or compare interventions.

Read it on PubMed →