SLPOtherJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2020

Pedigree-Based Gene Mapping Supports Previous Loci and Reveals Novel Suggestive Loci in Specific Language Impairment.

Erin M Andres, Kathleen Kelsey Earnest, Shelley D Smith and 2 others

PMID 33186502

WHAT IT FOUND

In six families with inherited language impairment, genetic mapping found possible regions in three families but not the other three.

These are research targets, not clinical tests or treatment guidance.

Key findings

01Suggestive evidence of linkage to three independent loci was reported in three families, while no suggestive or significant linkage was reported in the other three families.

02The reported highest linkage scores were 2.4 in Family 300 and Family 489, and 3.06 in Family 315.

03Branch analysis raised the multipoint score at 15q to 2.65 when Branches 1 and 3 were analyzed together.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only six families were studied, and suggestive linkage appeared in three families but not in the other three. The authors state the findings are not definitive and need further study. The Family 300 linkage region was large, which the authors say could reflect small family size. Family members were not screened for cognitive impairment, developmental delay, or autism, and one sibling with autism was included. A rare syndromic condition was later identified in a Branch 2 member of Family 315, but that member was not included in the analysis, and the authors note this may affect interpretation. Affected status depended on standardized language scores, so the genetic result is tied to that phenotype definition.

Declared interests

Funding came from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders and from start-up and research funds at KU. The funding statement says the funders had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, writing, or the decision to submit the article.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the reported chromosome regions as clinical tests, diagnoses, or treatment targets. The study found only suggestive linkage, not definitive gene effects, and the authors say further family-based studies are needed.

Read it on PubMed →