PTQualitativeMusculoskeletal science & practice2021

Patients' use of physical therapy for lower back pain: A qualitative study.

Jason A Sharpe, Anne Thackeray, Julie M Fritz and 3 others

PMID 34688104

WHAT IT FOUND

Patients with back pain often wanted a physician to diagnose them before physical therapy, even though they believed exercise helped.

Many did not recall being offered physical therapy, and copays discouraged repeated visits.

Key findings

01Patients' decisions were shaped by symptoms, diagnosis, provider training, recommendations, time, costs, and familiarity with the health system.

02Forty percent of patients did not know or were unsure they were asked about the physical therapy program, including 50 percent of those who declined it.

03Patients often preferred a physical medicine and rehabilitation physician to diagnose their back pain, yet they overwhelmingly said exercise was the best treatment.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 40 participants completed interviews from 188 invited, and the sample was mostly White, non-Hispanic, college or postgraduate educated, working full time, and married or living with a partner, so it may not represent other groups. Non-English speakers and patients not offered the RapidAccess program were excluded. Forty percent did not know or were unsure they were asked about the program, which limited understanding of active decision-making in that group. The study was done in one United States health system with commercial insurance and a specific RapidAccess pathway, so findings may not transfer to other systems. Interviews were not always completed before a provider visit, and some patients had multiple back pain episodes or unclear first provider choices. The primary investigator was a physical therapist, and the team included members involved with the program, which could influence data collection and interpretation. No patient input was included in designing the interview guide. The study reports experiences and themes, not measured outcomes or evidence that physical therapy works.

Declared interests

The study was funded by the University of Utah’s Imagine Perfect Care seed funding program. One author received support from the Foundation for Physical Therapy Research and from VA programs at the Durham VA Health Care System during dissemination. The funders had no role in design, conduct, or reporting. The authors declared no competing interests.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that patients avoided physical therapy because they thought it was ineffective or disliked it. The interviews showed many wanted a physician diagnosis first, did not remember being offered physical therapy, or worried about repeated copays, and the study did not test physical therapy outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →