RNOtherCritical care nursing quarterly

Patient Perspectives of Sickle Cell Management in the Emergency Department.

Nancy Crego, Rita Masese, Emily Bonnabeau and 4 others

PMID 33595963

WHAT IT FOUND

Patients with sickle cell pain reported waiting long ED times, feeling disbelieved, and leaving without follow-up or transport.

Many managed severe pain at home. The study describes these barriers; it did not test ED nursing changes.

Key findings

01Five themes emerged from interviews and focus groups: ED is the last resort, treatment delays, inadequate discharge and follow-up, drug seeking stigma and disbelief, and ED provider knowledge gaps.

02In the 6 months before the survey, 80% reported having severe pain episodes that kept them from their usual daily activities but were not seen by a doctor or nurse.

03Fifty percent of participants waited 120 minutes or more in the ED for treatment of their sickle cell pain.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Participants were recruited from one center, so results may not apply to all people with sickle cell disease. Only 14 participants completed interviews or focus groups, so qualitative themes come from a small group. Self-report was used for ambulatory and ED service use and was not validated with medical records. Most participants were affiliated with the study site, which already had sickle cell programs, so barriers may be under-reported and satisfaction over-reported.

Declared interests

The study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (U01HL133964). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that ED nurses are causing these delays or that a specific nursing change will improve pain control; the study reports patient perceptions at one center and did not test an intervention.

Read it on PubMed →