Parent and adolescent perspectives on decision-making involvement: A qualitative comparison in sickle cell and diabetes clinics.
Alfonso L Floyd, Alexis A Thompson, Alexander Fiks and 6 others
PMID 41175555WHAT IT FOUND
Clinicians were described as helping adolescents take part in decisions by asking them directly, giving information, building rapport, and seeking input.
In diabetes, parents often led the conversation. In sickle cell, clinicians sometimes spoke to parents rather than adolescents.
Key findings
01Adolescents and parents in both illness groups said clinicians helped adolescents take part by asking them directly, giving them information, building rapport, and seeking their input.
02Some adolescents with sickle cell disease and their parents described clinicians directing recommendations to parents rather than to the adolescent.
03Some parents of adolescents with diabetes were the main communicators with clinicians, and an adolescent said this made it hard to follow the visit.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The findings come from a single urban academic pediatric hospital, so they may not apply to other clinics or settings. Participants were adolescents and parents, not clinicians, so clinician behaviors were inferred from adolescent and parent reports rather than observed or reported by clinicians. Adolescents with sickle cell disease were seen by physicians, while adolescents with diabetes were seen by nurse practitioners, so differences between groups may reflect clinician type rather than illness. The sample was mainly English-speaking mothers, limiting relevance to fathers, other caregivers, and families who speak other languages. The study did not account for adolescent age or gender, which can influence decision-making involvement. Illness groups were used as a comparison, but race was not directly examined, so differences cannot be separated from racial or ethnic factors. Interviews were based on recall of a recent visit and were conducted by phone, so they may not capture all details of the clinic interaction.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read these themes as evidence that a communication strategy improves outcomes. They describe perceptions from interviews at a single hospital, and the study did not test any intervention.