RNOtherJournal of emergency nursing2021

Operationalizing a Pandemic-Ready, Telemedicine-Enabled Drive-Through and Walk-In Coronavirus Disease Garage Care System as an Alternative Care Area: A Novel Approach in Pandemic Management.

Patrice Callagy, Shashank Ravi, Saud Khan and 5 others

PMID 34303530

WHAT IT FOUND

During three pandemic surges, a telemedicine drive-through garage care area saw 5493 low-acuity patients; their average emergency department stay was 55 minutes, overall emergency department length of stay fell from 4.24 to 3.54 hours, and estimated PPE use fell 25% to 41%.

Key findings

01A total of 5493 patients received care in the Tele-Garage during the 3 times it was open in 2020.

02The average emergency department length of stay decreased 17%, from 4.24 hours during the week before opening to 3.54 hours during Tele-Garage operation.

03PPE use for patients classified as low acuity was estimated to decrease 25% to 41% when the Tele-Garage was open.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This was a single-site quality improvement evaluation using before-and-after charts, so other changes in the emergency department or pandemic period could have contributed to the observed reductions. The Tele-Garage bundled screening, remote registration, nurse triage and swabbing, telemedicine, discharge instructions, and follow-up calls, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. PPE savings were estimated from expected PPE sets before and during implementation, not directly measured. The garage required physical space next to the emergency department, wireless IT, equipment, and a generator, and it was not climate controlled, so it may not be feasible elsewhere. Eligibility was limited to patients aged 2 to 65 years, classified as low acuity, without heart disease, lung disease, diabetes, or immunocompromised status, so it does not address higher-acuity, older, or medically complex patients. The paper did not report patient or staff satisfaction, and it could not perform a cost analysis because supply-chain data were unreliable.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that telemedicine alone reduced emergency department length of stay or PPE use. The garage model bundled drive-through routing, remote registration, nurse triage and swabbing, telemedicine visits, discharge instructions, and follow-up calls, and the paper did not test these components separately. The PPE reduction was estimated from expected PPE use, not directly measured.

Read it on PubMed →