ONS Guidelines™ to Support Patient Adherence to Oral Anticancer Medications.
Sarah M Belcher, Emily Mackler, Benyam Muluneh and 18 others
PMID 35788731WHAT IT FOUND
For patients taking oral anticancer medications, the guideline suggests adding adherence risk assessment, education, ongoing checks, proactive follow-up, coaching, motivational interviewing, and structured programs.
Evidence is very low certainty.
Key findings
01The guideline conditionally recommends adding adherence risk assessment for patients starting oral anticancer medications.
02Adherence education may improve adherence rates by 10.61% compared with usual care, but certainty is very low.
03The panel made no recommendation for technology because the evidence was a knowledge gap.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Most recommendations are conditional and based on very low certainty evidence, so the true effect may be smaller or absent. The underlying studies varied widely in cancer type, medication regimen, intervention content, and usual care. Results may not apply to one patient. Several interventions were bundled with education, coaching, follow-up, or technology support, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. No standardized adherence risk assessment tool or ongoing assessment frequency was identified. The guideline does not replace clinician care or guarantee improved outcomes. Implementation needs staff time, coordination, training, and reimbursement, which may be hard to justify in smaller practices. The panel made no recommendation for technology because evidence was a knowledge gap.
Declared interests
The guideline panel had no relevant conflicts of interest. The supplied article metadata lists non-U.S. government and NIH extramural research support.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read these conditional recommendations as proof that any single intervention works. Most evidence is very low certainty, and several interventions were delivered together with education, coaching, or follow-up, so the effect of any one part cannot be separated.