Narrative ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2017

On neuromechanical approaches for the study of biological and robotic grasp and manipulation.

Francisco J Valero-Cuevas, Marco Santello

PMID 29017508

WHAT IT FOUND

There is nothing here to change therapy practice.

No patient data, tested intervention, or outcome is reported in this conceptual review of biological and robotic grasp and manipulation.

What this paper is

This is a narrative review of neuromechanical concepts for biological and robotic grasp and manipulation. It discusses engineering and neuroscience approaches, sensors, muscles, synergies, learning, and prosthetic design. It reports no patients, no tested intervention, and no outcome, so there is no clinical finding to act on.

Declared interests

The supplied text lists funding from the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, the National Science Foundation, and the Grainger Foundation. No author conflicts of interest are stated.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat this conceptual review as evidence that any robotic or prosthetic approach improves hand function. It reports no patients, outcomes, or tested interventions.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Certainty of evidence
Low

Browse

    Cite

    Francisco J Valero-Cuevas, Marco Santello On neuromechanical approaches for the study of biological and robotic grasp and manipulation. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2017.

    Read the original