RNSystematic ReviewRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2017

Non-pharmacological interventions to promote the sleep of patients after cardiac surgery: a systematic review.

Fernanda de Souza Machado, Regina Claudia da Silva Souza, Vanessa Brito Poveda and 1 others

PMID 28902932

WHAT IT FOUND

After cardiac surgery, earplugs, masks, relaxation, white noise, and education were reported to improve sleep, but trial quality was uneven and a massage study found no benefit.

Key findings

01Four of the ten trials tested devices such as earplugs, masks, headphones, and guided imagery; earplugs and masks were reported to reduce environmental stimuli and interference in sleep patterns.

02Relaxation trials reported significant sleep improvement, but a massage trial found no significant improvement; education and sleep-hygiene trials reported better sleep quality and lower anxiety, depression, and pain interference compared with those who did not receive education.

0350% of the included studies had moderate methodological quality, and one trial did not report why participants withdrew or use double-blind procedures.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only randomized trials were included. The search was limited to English, Portuguese, and Spanish. The included studies varied in interventions, populations, sleep measurement, and follow-up. This variation made it difficult to recommend one best approach. 50% of the studies had moderate methodological quality. One trial did not report why participants withdrew or use double-blind procedures. A massage trial found no significant improvement.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat these interventions as proven for every patient after cardiac surgery. The review included trials with uneven methodological quality, and a massage trial did not find significant improvement.

Read it on PubMed →