PTOTOtherJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026

Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation improves postural stability under virtual reality perturbation by enhancing vestibular processing and multisensory integration.

Haoyu Xie, Yan Li, Zengming Hao and 3 others

PMID 41821043

WHAT IT FOUND

In healthy adults, noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation reduced sway and muscle co-contraction during virtual reality visual conflict.

It also lowered reported cybersickness. The brain increased vestibular processing activity while decreasing cognitive load, suggesting more efficient balance control under sensory mismatch.

Key findings

01Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation significantly reduced center of pressure sway area and axes during virtual reality perturbation compared to sham.

02Stimulation decreased co-contraction of hip muscles (rectus femoris and biceps femoris) and reduced their activation levels during virtual reality tasks.

03Cortical activity in the supramarginal gyrus (vestibular processing) increased, while activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (cognitive control) decreased under stimulation during virtual reality conflict.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study included only healthy young adults, so results may not generalize to older adults or clinical populations with vestibular or neurological disorders. Virtual reality goggles were worn only during VR trials, not during eyes-open or eyes-closed control conditions, which could introduce mechanical confounding factors. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy cannot measure deep brain structures like the cerebellum or insula, limiting the understanding of full neural mechanisms. Electromyography could not isolate the transversus abdominis from the internal oblique, so trunk stabilization findings reflect composite activity. Multiple statistical tests were performed without correction across all outcome families, increasing the risk of false positives.

Declared interests

The authors declared no competing interests. The study was funded by the Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Guangdong-Hong Kong Technology and Innovation Cooperation Funding, and National Natural Science Foundation of China.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume this improves balance in all conditions. The benefit was specific to resolving visual-vestibular conflict; there was no significant difference between active and sham stimulation during eyes-closed standing, suggesting the mechanism relies on correcting mismatched sensory inputs rather than generally strengthening vestibular function.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →