Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation-Enhanced Physical Therapist Intervention for Functional Posterior Shoulder Instability (Type B1): A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Philipp Moroder, Katrin Karpinski, Doruk Akgün and 10 others
PMID 37870503WHAT IT FOUND
Adding motion-triggered electrical stimulation to physical therapy improved shoulder instability scores more than physical therapy alone.
The stimulation group reached 64% versus 51% for standard care, a difference large enough to change patient-reported function and satisfaction.
Key findings
01The primary outcome (WOSI) at 3 months was significantly better in the NMES-enhanced group (64%) than the physical therapy group (51%), with a mean difference of 13%.
0295% of patients in the NMES-enhanced group reported subjective improvement compared to 63% in the physical therapy group, and satisfaction scores were significantly higher.
03Patients who crossed over from physical therapy to NMES-enhanced therapy due to poor results showed significant improvement in WOSI and SANE scores at 6 months.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Recruitment was stopped early at 59 patients instead of the planned 66, reducing statistical power. Patients and clinicians could not be blinded to the treatment, which may have influenced subjective outcomes like satisfaction and reported improvement. There was a high dropout rate (10 patients excluded post-randomization, mostly for non-compliance), and follow-up rates dropped to 71.4% at one year. The physical therapists delivering the NMES intervention had no prior experience with the device, potentially affecting the consistency of delivery. The primary outcome was patient-reported; objective measures like strength and range of motion did not differ between groups, suggesting the mechanism may be neural rather than muscular.
Declared interests
The study was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, which had no role in the design, conduct, or reporting of the study. The NMES device used was the Neuralign System S by Alyve Medical, but no commercial funding from this company is reported.
The easy way to misread this
Do not interpret the improvement in patient-reported scores as a cure for structural instability or a guarantee of pain reduction. The study found no significant difference in pain scores or shoulder strength between groups, and most patients in both arms remained able to voluntarily dislocate their shoulders. The benefit was primarily in functional perception and instability frequency, not in restoring normal anatomy or eliminating all symptoms.