PTOTSLPNarrative ReviewJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2024

Multimodal Technologies for Remote Assessment of Neurological and Mental Health.

Vikram Ramanarayanan

PMID 38984943

WHAT IT FOUND

Combining speech, video, and text data in remote assessment platforms improves diagnostic accuracy and robustness compared to using any single data source alone.

Multimodal analysis provides a more holistic view of neurological and mental health status for clinicians.

Key findings

01Multimodal approaches combining speech, orofacial, and natural language features significantly outperform individual modalities in machine learning tasks such as classification and regression.

02Integrating multiple modalities improves system robustness; if one data stream (e.g., speech audio) is corrupted or missing, the system can still function using others (e.g., orofacial video).

03Specific modalities offer complementary clinical information: speech acoustics predict depression, orofacial movement predicts anxiety, and text content predicts suicide risk.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This is a narrative review, not a systematic review or meta-analysis, so it does not provide a comprehensive or unbiased synthesis of all available evidence. The review focuses on the potential and reported benefits of multimodal systems, with less critical appraisal of the methodological quality of the cited studies. Real-world implementation challenges, such as reimbursement, licensure, and privacy laws, are acknowledged but not resolved. The case study platform described is not compared head-to-head with standard clinical care in a randomized trial within this text.

Declared interests

The article stems from a symposium supported by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD). Research was also supported by NIDCD. The authors declare no other conflicts of interest in the provided text, but the funding source supports the field of digital health research.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume that these multimodal platforms are ready for immediate clinical replacement of standard assessments. The review highlights potential and reported performance gains in research settings, but it also notes significant open challenges regarding robustness, generalizability, and regulatory approval that must be addressed before widespread clinical adoption.

Read it on PubMed →