OTQualitativeOccupational therapy international2022

"Moving on to an Open World": A Study of Participants' Experience in Meaningful Activities and Recovery (MA&R).

Nanna Kaas Tepavicharov, Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen, Tom Møller and 2 others

PMID 36447938

WHAT IT FOUND

Participants described the program as a practical course, not therapy, and said small familiar activities became more meaningful.

They valued one-on-one support from an occupational therapist and a peer-worker, but group differences reduced connectedness.

Key findings

01Participants described MA&R as a practical, future-oriented course rather than illness-focused therapy, and valued being able to engage at their own pace.

02Most participants said their everyday life looked similar after MA&R, but their perspective on small, familiar activities changed and made them feel more meaningful.

03Group differences among participants were described as reducing connectedness and engagement, while the peer-worker's lived experience and respectful mentor contact were described as supporting engagement.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Thirteen participants were included, and all had completed MA&R; people who discontinued did not respond or refused interviews, so views from dropouts are missing. Ten of thirteen participants were men, so women's experiences were less represented. The study was conducted during COVID-19 restrictions, and nine interviews were remote while four were face-to-face, which may have affected participation and the types of activities described. Participants had finished MA&R 0, 4, or 12 months before interviews, so recall may differ. The analysis team were trained occupational therapists, which the authors say may introduce blind angles. This was a qualitative interview study, so it describes experiences, not whether MA&R caused recovery or improved outcomes.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these participant descriptions as evidence that MA&R causes recovery or improves occupational engagement. This study interviewed thirteen people who had completed the program and asked them to describe their experience; it did not compare MA&R with another intervention or measure outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →