"Moving on" through the locked ward system for women with intellectual disabilities.
Rebecca Fish, Hannah Morgan
PMID 30950144WHAT IT FOUND
Women and staff described moving on as proving behaviour change, not pursuing personal goals.
Trust, gradual control and shared goals were described by some as helping, while accepting aggression and compliance were expected.
Key findings
01Staff saw progression as changing behaviour, and women described the criteria as enforced requirements rather than personal goals.
02Some women described narrow expectations for a good day, such as being talkative and happy, or tolerating assault without retaliation.
03Trust, gradual transfer of control and sustained staff support were described by participants as important to progression.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The findings come from one NHS secure unit in England, on three wards, so they may not apply to other services. Women were only 20% of service users in this service, and all interview participants were white British, aged 18 to 60. Progression was not the study's original explicit focus; it emerged as a central theme during analysis. The study describes staff and women's views and observed routines, not a tested programme or measured community progress. Most women did not have a clear idea of how their progress was measured. The paper does not report what happened to women after they moved on.
The easy way to misread this
Do not treat compliance with ward rules as evidence that a woman is ready for community life. The study describes views and routines, and several women said they had to accept the regime, take medication, go to work, act happy or tolerate assault to be seen as moving on.