PTNarrative ReviewMusculoskeletal science & practice2026

Mechano responsiveness of neuroimmune cross-talk in bone and joints: A narrative review with implications for force-based manipulations.

Karl J Lewis, Jennifer Bent, Per Gunnar Brolinson and 8 others

PMID 41620320

WHAT IT FOUND

Physical activity and loading exercise are the best-supported way to build bone.

Hands-on treatments such as massage, acupuncture and spinal manipulation change some blood chemicals tied to bone turnover, but almost no human study checked whether the bone itself improves.

Key findings

01Human studies of hands-on treatment have mostly measured chemicals in blood, saliva or urine rather than bone, so whether massage, acupuncture or spinal manipulation actually changes bone quality in people is not known.

02The human results are inconsistent: massage therapy lowered cortisol in 7 of 10 studies the authors found, several studies found no change, and a review of spinal manipulation and cortisol rated that evidence low to very low quality.

03Physical activity and loading exercise are the best-supported route to bone benefit, but the effect has a ceiling: pushing weight-bearing and muscle loading too far brings diminishing bone returns and more stress fractures.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This is a narrative review. No search strategy or inclusion criteria are reported, so which studies were chosen and how much weight each gets is the authors' judgment, and no results were pooled numerically. Most human studies were small, used different techniques and treatment doses, and often had no sham control group, which the authors state themselves. Almost none of the human studies measured bone itself, so a change in a blood, saliva or urine chemical cannot be read as a change in bone quality. Some interventions were delivered as packages, for example multimodal chiropractic care that mainly includes spinal manipulation, so no single component can be credited with the change. The clearest bone results come from animal work in rats, mice and rabbits, and the authors note that many more human studies are needed before efficacy or effectiveness can be claimed.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest and no competing interests. The article text supplied does not name a funder.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this review as evidence that massage, acupuncture or spinal manipulation build bone. Almost none of the human studies measured bone; they measured chemicals in blood, saliva or urine, the results were inconsistent across studies, and the authors themselves say those treatments cannot yet be claimed to work.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →