RNOtherRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2019

Measuring instrument: knowledge, attitudes and practices of people with pulmonary tuberculosis.

Alba Idaly Muñoz-Sánchez, Yurian Lida Rubiano-Mesa, Carlos Julio Saavedra-Cantor

PMID 30698214

WHAT IT FOUND

A new questionnaire can classify adults with pulmonary tuberculosis by knowledge, attitudes and practices into four levels to target health education.

It was tested in Bogotá, but this is not proof that education improves patient outcomes.

Key findings

01The instrument was built around 43 items covering three dimensions.

02In sensitivity testing, patients averaged 12.03 correct answers on 24 knowledge questions, while control participants averaged 9.93.

03The final scale classified patients into high, medium-high, medium-low and low knowledge, attitudes and practice levels.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

It was tested only in Bogotá, Colombia, among adults newly admitted to a tuberculosis program, so it may not fit other cities, countries or patient groups. People with cognitive disabilities and patients readmitted after abandonment or relapse were excluded, so the findings do not apply to those groups. The study did not test whether using the questionnaire improves adherence, reduces transmission or changes any patient outcome. The attitudes dimension had weak internal consistency (0.32), and items 14, 19, 31 and 37 did not fit the expected dimensions, so subscores may be unreliable. The sensitivity test used only 30 patients and 30 waiting-room controls, and expert judgment used only three judges, so these steps were small.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as proof that educational interventions for pulmonary tuberculosis patients work. The study built and tested a measurement questionnaire; it did not deliver an education programme or measure adherence, transmission or other patient outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →