RNSurveyInternational journal of community based nursing and midwifery2020

Measurement Model of Women's Preferences in Obstetrician and Gynecologist Selection in the Private Sector: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis.

Masood Setoodefar, Hamed Tabesh, Fatemeh Tara and 6 others

PMID 32309456

WHAT IT FOUND

Women choosing an OB/GYN in private clinics valued quick access, respectful communication, privacy, and practical office features; physician gender was not a key factor.

Key findings

01The final measurement model had 6 latent variables and 29 observed variables.

02In the final model, accessibility and availability had the strongest measured relationship, while professionalism/recommendation and cost/insurance had the weakest.

03When physician gender was tested alongside other preferences, it was removed from the final model.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was cross-sectional and based on self-reported preferences in private OB/GYN offices in an Iranian city, so it may not apply to other settings or public hospitals. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted on the same data, so the model was not tested in an independent sample. Non-respondents were not characterized, so participants may have differed from women who declined. The model did not measure clinical quality, treatment outcomes, or diagnostic accuracy. Some questionnaire items were kept despite borderline validity scores.

Declared interests

The supplied text does not report funding or conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as proof that women always choose an OB/GYN based on access, communication, privacy, and office facilities. The study measured self-reported preferences in private offices in an Iranian city and did not test actual choices or clinical outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →