Maximizing Efficiency of Telemedicine in the Skilled Nursing Facility during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.
Sabrina P Jen, Albert Bui, Susan D Leonard
PMID 33991481WHAT IT FOUND
In a nursing home telemedicine project, troubleshooting time fell from 40% to 50% of rounds down to 0% after workflow changes.
Use video for exams, telephone for longer talks, and prepare staff, equipment, and WiFi.
Key findings
01Nonclinical troubleshooting time fell from 40% to 50% of rounding time to 0% over 9 improvement cycles.
02The most common delays were staff unfamiliarity with technology, missing bedside equipment or staff, and WiFi problems.
03The optimized workflow reserved video rounds for introductions and physical examinations and moved longer history or goals-of-care discussions to telephone.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The project measured only the percentage of rounding time spent on nonclinical troubleshooting; it did not measure quality of care, patient outcomes, or hospitalizations. It was done in 2 skilled nursing facilities with COVID-19 outbreaks, so staffing shortages and local conditions may not apply elsewhere. There was no control group or random allocation; changes were made through quality improvement cycles, so other factors could have affected the time measure. The optimized workflow included many changes at once, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. The authors note that minimum staffing rules may make the protocol hard to copy in other nursing homes. The authors state that strong evidence does not yet exist for efficacy or effectiveness, so outcomes cannot be assured.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that telemedicine rounds improved patient care, reduced hospitalizations, or are proven effective. The project measured time lost to technical troubleshooting, not clinical outcomes, and the authors say strong evidence for efficacy or effectiveness does not exist.