Managing Everyday Life in Double Exposure: Frail Older People's Experiences During a Pandemic.
Katharina Sjöberg, Synneve Dahlin-Ivanoff, Katarina Wilhelmson and 1 others
PMID 42432265WHAT IT FOUND
Frail older people already limited by illness and ageing called the pandemic a 'lost year'.
They felt powerless under rules they could not control and coped by accepting those rules and seeking small meaningful things: outdoor coffee with a neighbour, walks, phone calls.
Key findings
01Participants described living in 'double exposure': the limits they already had from ageing and illness were made worse by the restrictions, and the pandemic period was often called a 'lost year'.
02They described powerlessness: rules they were told to follow clashed with their need for contact in order to manage daily life, and restrictions undermined their sense of making their own decisions and of who they were.
03Two ways of coping stood out: accepting and trusting the restrictions, which gave some a sense of security, and striving for meaningfulness by adapting what they did, such as meeting people outdoors, keeping up phone or digital contact, or taking up solitary hobbies.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 20 people were interviewed, all recruited through one Swedish trial of patients who came to emergency care and screened as frail. Everyone had to be able to hold a telephone interview in Swedish, and the researchers excluded people with cognitive or hearing problems that would get in the way, so the most impaired were not heard from. All interviews were by telephone. The authors say this cost them non-verbal communication and body language, that some participants had deteriorated cognitively and struggled to elaborate, and that those with hearing impairment sometimes needed things repeated. They also say some participants would have been better served by meeting in person, which the pandemic made impossible. Interviews ran from October 2020 to February 2021, spanning different seasons, infection levels and degrees of restriction, so what each person described may reflect when they were interviewed, and later participants had had longer to get used to the situation than earlier ones. Interviews were short, between 11 and 33 minutes with a median of 23, which limits how much depth could be reached on any one topic and may have suited some participants better than others. The participants were self-selected from those invited, and the analysis was carried out by the first author with the last author, with the other co-authors discussing the work as it progressed.
Declared interests
The only funder named is the University of Gothenburg. The article text supplied contains no competing-interest declaration, so nothing is stated about other financial or professional interests of the authors.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as evidence about what the restrictions did to frail older people's health, or that any particular support would fix it. No outcomes were measured, there was no comparison group, and it is 20 people describing a year, all of them well enough to take a phone call, so the most disabled were not included.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →