Looking Behavior and Audiovisual Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing and Children With Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss.
Dawna E Lewis, Nicholas A Smith, Jody L Spalding and 1 others
PMID 29252979WHAT IT FOUND
Children with mild bilateral or unilateral hearing loss followed spoken instructions less accurately than normal-hearing peers in noisy multi-talker videos, but looking at talkers did not explain performance and hearing loss did not make children look more at relevant talkers.
Key findings
01Children with mild bilateral or unilateral hearing loss were less accurate at following instructions than children with normal hearing (80.3% vs 87.8% correct).
02Children looked at the relevant talker screen only 19.1% of instruction time, with no hearing-status group difference.
03Looking at any screen was not related to instruction-following performance.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study included only 18 children with normal hearing and 18 children with mild bilateral or unilateral hearing loss, so the findings may not apply to larger or more diverse groups. Four children were excluded from eye-tracking analyses because of calibration problems. Children with hearing loss were tested without amplification, so the results do not show performance with hearing aids. The unilateral hearing loss group did not represent a full range of degree of hearing loss. Eye tracking could not reliably measure looking at the mat, so it is unknown where children looked when they were not looking at talker screens. The study did not measure working memory or attention skills, which may influence looking strategies and performance. The three conditions were presented in the same order for all children, so order effects cannot be ruled out. The task used background noise only, not reverberation, and simulated talkers rather than a real classroom.
Declared interests
The article is listed as supported by NIH extramural research; no author conflict-of-interest declaration appears in the supplied text.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that children with mild bilateral or unilateral hearing loss compensate by looking more at talkers. They did not look more at relevant talkers than normal-hearing children, and looking behavior was not related to instruction-following accuracy.