PTQualitativeHeart & lung : the journal of critical care2020

Long-term exercise adherence in patients with heart failure: A qualitative study.

Shane Warehime, Danae Dinkel, Windy Alonso and 1 others

PMID 32861888

WHAT IT FOUND

Heart failure patients in an exercise program said feeling stronger, having a routine, support, and learning helped them keep exercising.

Some still reported no benefit or health problems.

Key findings

0172.7% referenced improved endurance, vitality, or energy, and 59.1% said seeing health or fitness improvements motivated them to continue.

0240.9% reported mental health improvements, and 31.8% reported health complications or no physical or mental improvement.

03Social support was mentioned by 66.7% of non-adherent participants, 50.0% of adherent participants, and 40.0% of partially adherent participants.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Twenty-two participants, all from the intervention arm, cannot represent all heart failure patients. The study asked patients to describe their experience, so it cannot show that any support caused adherence. The sample was split into adherent, partially adherent, and non-adherent groups, and the authors said there was insufficient data for meaningful comparisons. Interviews were done after the long-term study, so memory of earlier phases may be incomplete. Functional class and age were not considered in the analysis. Some participants reported no benefit or complications, so perceived gains were not universal.

Declared interests

The article is listed as supported by NIH extramural research, and the authors declared no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these themes as evidence that any one strategy causes better adherence. The study interviewed 22 patients about their perceptions, and the authors say it is unclear whether professional coaches or peers were more effective.

Read it on PubMed →