Living with support: Experiences of people with mild intellectual disability.
Sanne A H Giesbers, Lex Hendriks, Andrew Jahoda and 2 others
PMID 30362653WHAT IT FOUND
Six adults with mild intellectual disability described staff as their closest social ties, yet felt let down by turnover and rigid boundaries.
Continuity mattered most; one trusted key worker helped buffer the loss of others.
Key findings
01Participants valued continuity of support highly, with one person noting that a nine-year relationship with a key worker allowed staff to better understand his emotional states.
02Staff turnover and service cuts were described as barriers to building relationships, causing participants to feel abandoned and unable to choose which staff remained.
03Participants experienced stigma related to receiving support, which they felt hindered friendships and contributed to struggles with identity and self-worth.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they found
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study included only six participants, so the findings cannot be generalized to all people with mild intellectual disability. All participants lived in similar supported housing arrangements in the Netherlands, so experiences may differ in other countries or support models. One interview was very short (18 minutes), which may have limited the depth of that participant's account, though the authors noted this brevity aligned with the participant's expressed lack of trust.
Declared interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read these themes as evidence that specific staff training methods improve outcomes. The study describes how six individuals felt about their support, not how effective any intervention was.