PTOTRNQualitativeNursing in critical care2026

Lived Experience of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Survivors: A Phenomenological Study.

Meng Zhang, Anqi Sun, Anqi Yu and 4 others

PMID 41622423

WHAT IT FOUND

Some ECMO survivors described lasting weakness, trouble walking, emotional distress and financial burden.

Participants wanted clearer rehabilitation advice, and some wanted simpler follow-up and regular contact.

Key findings

01After discharge, survivors reported lasting weakness, fatigue and reduced ability to do heavy work or usual physical activity.

02Some survivors reported trouble lifting a leg or using a wheelchair because of leg weakness.

03Most participants wanted rehabilitation programs, illness guidance and counselling, and some wanted simpler follow-up procedures.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was conducted at Tongji Hospital in China, and the authors note that regional differences in healthcare systems, resources and culture may limit transferability. It excluded people with cognitive impairment, psychiatric disorders, terminal illness or irreversible conditions, so it does not represent survivors with post-ICU psychological sequelae such as PTSD. It is a qualitative interview study, so it describes experiences and needs; it does not test whether rehabilitation, follow-up or support changes outcomes. Sixteen survivors were interviewed, with 10 men and 6 women, so the sample is small and purposive rather than representative.

Declared interests

The authors report no conflicts of interest and nothing to report for funding.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read survivors' reports of walking or rehabilitation as proof that a specific exercise programme works. This study described experiences, not tested interventions, and it excluded people with cognitive or psychiatric disorders.

Read it on PubMed →