Linguistic Validation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Shoulder Telehealth Assessment Tool for Filipino Patients with Musculoskeletal Shoulder Condition: Cross-Sectional Study.

The study tested translation, expert agreement, and user understanding; it did not compare Filipino STAT results with in-person shoulder examination or imaging. The pilot analysed 46 participants and the pretest had 12, so the findings may not apply to other Filipino populations or settings. Participants needed stable internet and a device with video call capacity, so patients with poorer access were not represented. Each item was tried twice, with and without pictures, which may have made the consultation longer and harder than routine use. Strength items were poorly understood, and some participants made compensatory movements but still reported that they could complete the task. The research team and clinical experts were physiatrists, so the validation was done mainly by one profession.

The supplied text does not state a funding source or authors' conflict-of-interest declaration. Translators, recording observers, and a Filipino teacher were paid Philippine ₱1000 each; phase 2 participants were paid Philippine ₱200; clinical experts were not paid.

Do not conclude that the Filipino STAT can replace an in-person shoulder examination or diagnose shoulder pathology. The study tested translation and understandability, not accuracy against clinical examination, and the authors state it should only aid clinicians.