SLPRNCase ReportJournal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners2025

Lack of Immediate Diagnosis and Appropriate Intervention Leads to Malnutrition in an Infant With Cleft Palate.

Jessica L Williams, Megan Halvorson, Katelyn J Kotlarek

PMID 39046401

WHAT IT FOUND

A missed cleft palate diagnosis and lack of early feeding advice led to mild malnutrition in an infant.

Switching to a cleft-adapted bottle reduced feeding time from 60 to 20 minutes and improved weight z-scores, allowing timely surgery.

Key findings

01The infant's weight z-score improved from -1.45 (mild malnutrition) to -0.44 (no longer malnourished) after using a cleft-adapted bottle.

02Feeding duration decreased from 60 minutes per feed to 20 minutes after the intervention.

03The cleft palate was not identified during the hospital stay, and no feeding recommendations were made by the pediatrician or otolaryngologist despite observed prolonged feeding times.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPsWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This is a single case report, so it cannot prove that the bottle caused the weight gain or that this outcome will happen for other infants. The infant had no other comorbidities, so the results may not apply to babies with additional health issues. The improvement occurred alongside multiple changes: switching bottles, receiving volume guidelines, and starting weekly weight monitoring. The specific contribution of the bottle alone cannot be separated from the other support.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume that using a cleft-adapted bottle guarantees weight gain or prevents malnutrition in all infants. This is one case where the bottle, combined with volume guidance and monitoring, helped. It is not evidence of efficacy for the general population.

Read it on PubMed →